Check out the Latest Articles:

Saturday, February 11, 2012

Hello there, today I'm bringing you a small cartoon by a very smart guy. This cartoon belongs to a series called "The Far Side" and was drawn by Gary Larson. 
As you should know, darwinian natural selection deffends the survival of the fittest, being overcentered in the inter-species competition, but, nowadays, neo-darwinian natural selection is all about the best traits (the best alleles in each gene) and the way they are passed down to the descendants, centered in the intra-species competition.
In this case, darwinians would deffend that the carnivores were stronger, and that led to the end of the unicorns, but, in other and, neo-darwinians would say that the unicorns did not posses the traits to survive the stress caused by the carnivores. 
We can also look at this cartoon and notice a problem that has been present in all the planet for some centuries. The problem is the way species interact with each other and, what could happen if we change some individuals from habitat. But I'll leave that for another day.

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Hello

Today I'm going to talk a little about one of the most famous pairs in the biological sciences. James D. Watson and Francis Crick uncovered the stucture of the DNA molecule, revolutionating the way most biologists think since then. It was olny after this breakthroug that all the geneticists and evolutionists would be able to understand live beings in a celular/molecular way. Their results were published in a 1953 Nature edition. (these articles can be found here for consult: http://www.nature.com/nature/dna50/archive.html). It is said by the legend that has they entered Eagle pub in Cambridge, Crick announced, "We have found the secret of life!".
Furthermore, it was only after this huge foundation was built that, in 1958, Francis Crick was able to determin what was called "The Central Dogma of Molecular Biology".


Privacy Policy for An Evolution Thing (http://anevolutionthing.blogspot.com/ )

If you require any more information or have any questions about our privacy policy, please feel free to contact us by email at f.sousalouro@gmail.com. 
At   http://anevolutionthing.blogspot.com/ , the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us. This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by   http://anevolutionthing.blogspot.com/    and how it is used.

Log Files
Like many other Web sites,  http://anevolutionthing.blogspot.com/   makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol ( IP ) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider ( ISP ), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user’s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons
http://anevolutionthing.blogspot.com/   does not use cookies.

DoubleClick DART Cookie
.:: Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on  http://anevolutionthing.blogspot.com/ .
:: Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to   http://anevolutionthing.blogspot.com/   and other sites on the Internet. 
.:: Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html

Some of our advertising partners may use cookies and web beacons on our site. Our advertising partners include ....
Google Adsense
These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on   http://anevolutionthing.blogspot.com/  send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.
http://anevolutionthing.blogspot.com/  has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.
You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices.   http://anevolutionthing.blogspot.com/  's privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites. 
If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browsers' respective websites.

Tuesday, February 7, 2012


When someone talks of evolution, there are people that automatically associate the evolution of men with the other primates. Questions like "Did humans really evolve from apes?" is constantly shouted in some parts of the world and the answer is simple: No, humans did not evolve from apes, humans are apes.
Well, the expression "Ape" is relative to all the individuals that are presently in the Superfamily Hominoidea, that contains two families: The Hylobatidae, or the family of the lesser apes, and the Hominidae, described as the great apes, where humans are included.
The correct observation is that humans and the other apes evolved from the same ancestor. This ancestor, would have been a primate, similar to many others still existing today, which individuals would have diverged, so that today many kinds of apes could exist.
As to the evolution of Man, it was first discussed by Darwin himself in his followup book "A Descent of Man" (1871), where he unfolded sexual selection.

Hello, I'd like to share with you an article about the life and work of Dr. Hamilton, called by many "The Greatest Darwinian after Darwin".
Reading about the life of people helps, very often, to understand their work and methods.
Hope you like it: http://psych.mcmaster.ca/dalywilson/memoriam.pdf


Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Most plants use pollen to perform sexual reproduction and cross pollination acts as a way of defense in a population, since it avoids consanguinity and all the dangers of such. Although the wind and other abiotic factors were the simplest ways to achieve that goal, it required an extreme amount of energy spent on reproduction, making it impossible for plants to develop further. Then, so that plants could focus their energy on other areas of their development, new adaptations started to appear. Characteristics such as presence of nectar or attractive patterns on the flowers, made some animals (insects, small birds and some bats) interested in the flowers. Those were the first biotic pollinators. Biotic pollinators are a more effective way to perform cross pollination, since it needs the production of less pollen by the plants, leaving the possibility for further development in other areas, with the small price of keeping the pollinators happy (production of nectar, release of attractive aroma, presentation of attractive colors). Still, the percentage of pollen effectively used to fecund the other flowers is very small, since the pollinators go through several species of plants and the pollen needs to find a suitable match so that reproduction may, actually, happen. It his travels, Darwin found a plant that had that problem easily resolved. The Madagascar star orchid (Angraecum sesquipedale) has an overdeveloped nectary (with a maximum of 30 cm) that, at the light of co-evolution could only mean one thing: this plant had a pollinator partner. In 1877, by analyzing the nectary of the orchid, Darwin and his supporter Wallace predicted that there would be an insect with a proboscis as big as the nectary.  It was only in 1903, that the insect was found. The Morgan’s sphinx moth (Xanthopan morgani predicta) had, indeed, a proboscis that could easily access the nectar produced by the orchid. Therefore, the hypothesis that the moth and the orchid had developed in a mutualist way was easy to accept. But it took another century, for Ennos to propose an hypothesis that could also explain the phenomenon. The hypothesis proposed was based also on co-evolution, but on a competitive type one. Ennos proposed that there were several populations of moths. He stated that the evolution of the proboscis were due to the competition between two populations of moths fighting for the same niche. Only the population with the bigger proboscis would be able to retrieve the nectar from the orchids, prevailing over the other population. This way, according to the Gause's law of competitive exclusion, only this would survive. This controversy has been popular in the last years, having the scientific community not reached an agreement yet. 

Hello, In this blog, "An Evolution Thing", we are going to talk about some curiosities about evolution. We are going to get to know some stories about the people that started to uncover the theory that today would be considered the backbone of the life sciences and others that, still today, keep discovering greater and better things about life.